Ethereum’s Revolutionary Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Protocol and it’s Battle Against Centralization

Image for post

Proof-of-Stake (PoS) has some clear-cut advantages of PoW that I’ll highlight quickly:

Image for post

Here’s a brief breakdown of what’s currently necessary to run an ETH 2.0 node and be involved directly in securing the network (you can learn more here):

– A three year commitment to staking 32 ETH and maintaining a validator node

– 32 ETH (plus <1 ETH for gas costs)

– $717.12 (three-year reserved instance pricing for an m5.xlarge instance) + 120 (one year’s cost of 100 GB of storage, conservatively assuming nearly full storage capacity) = $837.12 paid over the course of the year to AWS

– MetaMask Extension

– Infura Account

– Configured AWS instance (three year commitment, can be less but you save money with more time and you are locked in) with hardened security features

– Import verification keys, run Teku, setup monitoring

Image for post

So how can we fight the impediments that threaten to make ETH 2.0 more centralized and give power back to the average user?

Analytics

Comment